By JOSEPH V. AMODIO
Special to Newsday
Swell. Just what we need. Another Brit superstar.
Gone are the days when the box-office draws were Mel, Bruce, Ahhhnold or Sly, dressed in cargo pants (to hold the ammo) and a white tank (distressed and stained, no doubt, from the recent explosion and dive through a plate-glass window).
Today's movie marquees are cluttered with blokes named Jude and Clive and Orlando. And next year, Daniel (as in Daniel Craig, the gent that Sony Pictures has introduced to the world as the next James Bond).
What this means for American guys? Keep up with the dressing up.
"The idea of dressing up has vaguely feminine connotations for American men, but those are breaking down," says Souri Kim, fashion market director for Details magazine. He cites the usual shtick about how guys these days are more comfortable with grooming and caring about the way we look. But it's Hollywood, too.
"I think it says something that an actor like Jude Law is such a huge star," says Kim. "The ideal now is essentially British." Which is why guys are taking a few more minutes in the morning to tackle that Windsor knot. That's saying something, considering that the American style mantra is comfort, comfort, comfort. Remember, we're the ones who came up with the track suit as evening wear -- stroke of genius, that one.
The British trend has been coming on for a few seasons now, but last spring's flood of Carnaby striped shirts clinched it. And this season the Brit fit is still going strong: Shirt collars are spread; tie knots, fat; sweaters and jackets, all nubby wool and layered.
The folks at Saks Fifth Avenue are right in step. At the Manhattan flagship store, the newly revamped sixth- and seventh-floor menswear boast stand-alone shops for Paul Smith, Ted Baker, Burberry.
"Paul Smith is the granddaddy of the striped shirt," says Michael Macko, men's fashion director at Saks. "Just when you think you don't need another print, he'll do one more, and it's great." Wallpaper patterns, mini florals -- all to mix and match with plaids and tweed.
"If Paul Smith is quirky, Ted Baker is completely loony," Macko jokes, noting the subtle, surprise extras that often come standard on English attire: the rainbow linings on a Paul Smith suit, a fuchsia undercollar (no one knows it's there lest you pop the collar) on a Ted Baker chocolate velvet blazer, or a staid brown plaid jacket by Rufus hyped with bright red stitched button holes.
"It's that little quirkiness -- what I call the smile factor," notes Jerry Balest, vice president of men's fashion for Macy's.
This offbeat Brit sensibility was the inspiration behind ML/Material London, a new private label at Macy's, ranging from tees ($20) to slim-cut suits ($595). Though the line could loosen up a bit with color, the striped shirts and velvet blazers feel as good as they look.
I don't know if it's the result of growing up poor, or the fact that (most of the time) I don't care about fashion, but if an item of clothing is over $20, I won't buy it.
ReplyDeleteBack when I was making decent cash, I spent $60 once on a pair of Tommy Hilfiger khakis, but that was an extravagence...
I just don't see the value in dropping that much cash on clothes that I'm going to drop a burrito on.
I agree with you. It's hard to justify dropping a bunch of dough on something that wears out as fast as everyday clothes.
ReplyDeleteI have several things that are really expensive, but most of my stuff is in the under $50 range. My main "cost is no object" clothing item is footwear. Even if everything else I got on is from Wal-Mart, I have to have nice shoes.
I wish I could say the same about my footwear...
ReplyDeleteI have four pairs of shoes:
1) A Pair of grey and blue suede Vans (my casual look)
2) A pair of Reebok running shoes (used pretty much just for running)
3) A pair of black leather Sketcher dress shoes that have a hole in the sole that almost goes all the way through.
4) A pair of brown casual shoes...not quite "boat" shoes, but a similar style. They are so heavy, it's crazy. They are also a size too big, but I didn't take them back because they were a gift. For work purposes, they're ok, but if I have to walk any farther than to/from my car and around the office, by the end of the day, the back of my heel hurts from the shoe rubbing up and down on them.
I've got to get some new shoes...
Man, that sucks. The dress shoes seem to be in worse shape for you than the sneaks. Holes and heel slippage get old pretty quick. Hopefully Santa will bring you some new kicks.
ReplyDeleteI have something like 30 pairs of shoes of all types. Half are sneakers, and the others are dressier stuff and boots.
I need some new dressier kicks (among other things) for my new job at Block, but I don't know if I'll get them now. I really have enough to do me, and I don't have the money to waste on them right now.
If am gonna waste any dough on new stuff I need dress shirts and ties worse. Esspecially ties. Most of my ties are from high school and look it.