Sunday, January 15, 2006

We could each be Dr. King

Real story of Dr. King could inspire action; instead, we hear feel-good whitewash

Geov Parrish
WorkingForChange.com

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., would be 77 today. He has been dead for 38 years. As his living memory fades, replaced by a feel-good "I have a dream" whitewash that ignores much of what he stood for and fought against, it's more important than ever to recapture the true history of Dr. King -- because much of what he fought against is resurfacing or still with us today.

King, the man, was, along with Mohandas Gandhi, one of the two most internationally revered symbols of nonviolence in the 20th century. He spent his too-brief adult life defying authority and convention, citing a higher moral authority, and gave hope and inspiration for the liberation of people of color on six continents. MLK Day, the holiday, has devolved into the Mississippi Burning of third Mondays. What started out as gratitude, that they made a movie about it, gradually becomes revulsion at how new generations of Euro-Americans mislearn the story.

King is not a legend because he believed in diversity trainings and civic ceremonies, or because he had a nice dream. He is remembered because he took serious risks and, as the Quakers say, spoke truth to power. King is also remembered because, among a number of brave and committed civil rights leaders and activists, he had a flair for self-promotion, a style that also appealed to white liberals, and the extraordinary social strength of the black Southern churches behind him. And because he died before he had a chance to be widely believed a relic or buffoon.

What little history TV will give us in the next few days is at least as much about forgetting as about remembering, as much about self-congratulatory patriotism that King was American as self-examination that American racism made him necessary and that government, at every level, sought to destroy him. We hear "I have a dream"; we don't hear his powerful indictments of poverty, the Vietnam War, and the military-industrial complex. We see Bull Connor in Birmingham; we don't see arrests for fighting segregated housing in Chicago, or the years of beatings and busts before he won the Nobel Peace Prize. We don't hear about the mainstream American contempt at the time for King, even after that Peace Prize, nor the FBI harassment or his reputation among conservatives as a Commie dupe.

We don't see retrospectives on King's linkage of civil rights with Third World liberation. We forget that he died in Memphis lending support for a union (the garbage workers' strike), while organizing a multi-racial Poor Peoples' Campaign that demanded affordable housing and decent-paying jobs as basic civil rights transcending skin color. We forget that many of King's fellow leaders weren't nearly so polite. Cities were burning. We remember Selma instead.

And we forget that of those many dreams King had, only one -- equal access for non-whites -- is significantly realized today. A half-century after the Montgomery bus boycott catapulted a 26-year-old King into prominence, even that is only partly achieved. Blacks are being systematically disenfranchised in our presidential elections, and affirmative action and school desegregation are all but dead. Urban school districts across the country these days are as segregated and unequal as ever, and the imminent confirmation of Samuel Alito to the U.S. Supreme Court likely heralds a new era where employers and landlords can discriminate with near-impunity.

But an even bigger problem, as a generation dies off and the historical memory fades, is that Dr. King has become an icon, not a historical figure (distorted or otherwise). History requires context; icons don't. The racism King challenged four and five decades ago in Georgia and Alabama was also dominant throughout the country. Here in Seattle, few whites know that history: the housing and school segregation, laws barring Asians from owning land (overturned only in the '60s), the marches downtown from predominantly black Garfield High School, police harassment of both radical and mainstream black activists, the still-unsolved assassination of a local NAACP leader.

Every city in America has such histories. We don't know the stories of the people, many still with us, who led those struggles. And we rarely acknowledge that the overt racism of Montgomery 1955 is no longer so overt, but still part of America 2006. It shows up in our geography, in our jails, in our schools, in our voting booths, in our shelters and food banks, in our economy, and in the very earnest and extremely white activist groups that often carry the banner on these issues.

If our cities were serious about his legacy, Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. would run through downtowns, and there would be MLK Elementary Schools in the suburbs. Instead, in just about every big city in the U.S., school districts and city councils put King back in the ghetto, along with both the legions of people who worked with him and the many more who've taken up his work since.

Opponents of affirmative action and racial equality can claim King's mantle and "if he were alive today" approval only because in 2006, pop culture's MLK has no politics. And, for that matter, no faith. For white America, King's soft-focus image often reinforces white supremacism. "See? We're not so bad. We honor him now. Why don't those black people just get over it, anyway? We did."

All that is a lie. Dr. King's vision is today as urgent as ever. While Jim Crow and the cruelties of overt segregation are now largely unimaginable, much remains to be done. And for those who carry King's banner, the challenges of apathy and official hostility remain the same: the FBI and NSA spying on peace groups, listening to phone calls, monitoring e-mails. An administration -- voted for by almost no African-Americans -- that reviles nonviolence and labels its critics as treasonous (rather than as communist dupes). And the moral outrage of Americans, that made King's work so politically effective? We don't do that any more. We can torture thousands of mostly innocent Iraqis and Afghans, in plain sight, and nobody is held accountable. It'd take a whole lot more than Bull Connor's police dogs to make the news today.

The saddest loss in the modern narrative of Dr. King's career is the story of who he was: a man without wealth, without elected office, who managed as a single individual to change the world simply through the strength of his moral convictions. His power came from his faith, and his willingness to act on what he knew to be right. That story could inspire many millions to similar action -- if only it were told. We could each be Dr. King.

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., nonviolent martyr to reconciliation and justice, has become a Hallmark Card, a warm, fuzzy, feel-good invocation of neighborliness, a file photo for sneakers or soda commercials, a reprieve for post-holiday shoppers, an excuse for a three-day weekend, a cardboard cutout used for photo ops by dissembling Cabinet members and ungrateful Supreme Court justices. Be sure to check out the Three-Day-Only White Sale at WalMart. Always lower prices. Always.

King deserves better. We all do.

4 comments:

  1. "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character."
    - Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

    I have always admired this quote from Dr. King - people being judged on "the content of their character" - rather than color or social status. Its a very democratic and American idea.

    Ken

    ReplyDelete
  2. It is an ideal goal to be sure. I think we're ever so slowly moving that direction as a society, but it's fraught with roadblocks on all sides.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is a very thought-provoking article, Steve, thanks for posting it. It certainly challenged me to remember the significance of Dr. King's legacy. Those of us too young to have lived in this era need to know about this period in American history...it teaches many lessons today.

    I think the best thing about this article is that it begs the question, where is the outrage today? Where are the leaders who can channel it into constructive criticism, as Dr. King did, and force change? It pains me to think that people are too complacent, or worse, apathetic, to demand more from the system. There continues to be a need for real change.

    It's bizarre to think that so few African-Americans voted for President Bush. How can he purport to represent their interests?

    ReplyDelete
  4. The outrage died for two reasons. One, the hate-mongers got more sophisticated in the presentation of their message. When obvious hate speech became unacceptable, they started speaking in vague “patriotic” and “family” undertones; saying a lot of the same things, but in a fuzzier, feel-good way. People from both sides, from hard-core racists to former revolutionaries got caught up in the kinder, gentler form of classism and racism and hold it out under the “family values” banner today.

    Two, many of the former revolutionaries went corporate. Many of them scored well-paying jobs in business and government due to their activism and then silenced themselves for fear of losing those jobs. The leaders that replaced them were less sophisticated and less appealing to the masses, rendering the message less relevant over time.

    There are undercurrents of change today. People are starting to realize that many of the gains scored in the recent past are slipping away and are stepping up to the plate to do something about it. Still, there is no unifying figure standing up for justice that resonates like Dr. King did. On the other hand, President Bush is serving as an icon for the other side: the subversive racism, the erosion of freedoms, the lessening of power for the individual and the gaining of power for private industry.

    We’ve overcome a lot, but there is still so much more to do, and time is not on our side.

    ReplyDelete